How good is the new Zuiko MC-20 teleconverter?

I finally received my Zuiko MC-20 teleconverter and was eager to run it through a few tests to see if it exacts an image quality penalty – as it theoretically must.  Since the focal length rises, all of the optical aberrations in the base lens become exaggerated and more visible.

I was not able to test the Zuiko 300 mm f/4 PRO because even at 300mm focal length I cannot fully frame my new larger ISO 11223 test chart and remain inside my house.  So I only tested the Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO with the MC-14 and the MC-20 at a final  150 mm focal length as well as one other constant aperture, internal zooming lens for comparison – the Sigma 80-300mm f/2.8 in EOS mount but adapted to m43.

MTF curves in clockwise direction from upper left:  Zuiko 40-150mm (f/2.8), Zuiko + MC-14 (f/4),  Sigma 80-300mm (f/2.8), and Zuiko + MC-20 (f/5.6).   MTF10 in red, MTF30 in green.

I also performed the resolution test that I introduced on the last blog to evaluate the resolution gains of High Res mode.


The resolution test unfortunately only tests an area right next to the image center and as the MTF curves show, the center in all tests is quite sharp so the numbers are all similar.

The falloff in sharpness does not occur until the peripheral 10% of the image for the base Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 lens and this falloff occurs sooner and closer to the center with the use of an increasingly powerful teleconverter.  The Sigma 80-300mm f/2.8 performs nearly as well as the Zuiko but is a much larger and heavier lens.

So the MC-20 doesn’t break the laws of optics and it appears to be a quality product but you will lose two stops of light.  It is a product of immense convenience but if you are able to carry lots of lenses and you need low light top quality images I would use my Sigma 500mm f/4 prime reduced to 350mm f/2.8 with a Metabones Ultra telecompressor.  It will definitely outperform a Zuiko 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro with MC-20 operating as a 300mm f/5.6.

But in daylight telephoto situations it acquits itself quite well and image degradation will not be apparent to the eye without side by side image comparisons.   I was deer hunting in my home city of Toronto for the past few weeks and finally bagged one this Sunday morning.   Deer migrate from north of the city down the corridor of the Don River ravine where there are interspersed regions of forests and meadows for refuge, only a few hundred meters away from the busy Don Valley Parkway highway where in excess of a hundred thousand vehicles travel daily.   They are the largest wild mammal regularly found within the city but unfortunately they are not necessarily safe from predation since the city also supports a population of coyotes.   The best way to access these areas is by using the cycling paths and I wore my E-M1X and 40-150mm f/2.8 Pro on my Cotton Carrier vest.  Carrying the MC-20 to double my focal length reach was pure convenience joy.  I have worn the 300mm Pro lens with the E-M1X on the same Cotton Carrier but the smaller zoom is more versatile and I’m much more confidant carrying it when cycling or e-scootering.


Addendum  (Feb 21/20):

I recently discovered that I could indeed test the Zuiko 300mm f/4 lens in the house with both the MC-14 and MC-20.  Here are the results.

Screen Shot 2020-02-26 at 6.30.00 AM

As expected, there is mild image degradation with use of each teleconverter and the significant loss of aperture but it seems well controlled and certainly not the fault of the teleconverter optics but the laws of optical physics.






Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s